Short report

Membrane estrogen receptor-α-mediated nongenomic actions of phytoestrogens in GH₃/B₆/F₁₀ pituitary tumor cells

Yow-Jiun Jeng , Mikhail Y Kochukov and Cheryl S Watson

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA

author email corresponding author email

Journal of Molecular Signaling 2009, 4:2doi:10.1186/1750-2187-4-2

Published:	28 April 2009

Abstract

Background

Estradiol (E₂) mediates various intracellular signaling cascades from the plasma membrane via several estrogen receptors (ERs). The pituitary is an estrogen-responsive tissue, and we have previously reported that E₂ can activate mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) such as ERK1/2 and JNK1/2/3 in the membrane ERα (mERα)-enriched GH₃/B₆/F₁₀ rat pituitary tumor cell line. Phytoestrogens are compounds found in plants and foods such as soybeans, alfalfa sprouts, and red grapes. They are structurally similar to E₂ and share a similar mechanism of action through their binding to ERs. Phytoestrogens bind to nuclear ERs with a much lower affinity and therefore are less potent in mediating genomic responses. However, little is known about their ability to act via mERs to mediate nongenomic effects.

Methods

To investigate the activation of different nongenomic pathways, and determine the involvement of mERα, we measured prolactin (PRL) release by radio-immunoassay, MAPK activations (ERK1/2 and JNK1/2/3) via a quantitative plate immunoassay, and intracellular [Ca²⁺] by Fura-2 fluorescence imaging in cells treated with E₂ or four different phytoestrogens (coumestrol, daidzein, genistein, and trans-resveratrol).

Results

Coumesterol and daidzein increased PRL release similar to E₂ in GH₃/B₆/F₁₀ cells, while genistein and trans-resveratrol had no effect. All of these compounds except genistein activated ERK1/2 signaling at 1–10 picomolar concentrations; JNK 1/2/3 was activated by all compounds at a 100 nanomolar concentration. All compounds also caused rapid Ca²⁺ uptake, though in unique dose-dependent Ca²⁺ response patterns for several aspects of this response. A subclone of GH₃ cells expressing low levels of mERα (GH₃/B₆/D₉) did not respond to any phytoestrogen treatments for any of these responses, suggesting that these nongenomic effects were mediated via mERα.

Conclusion

Phytoestrogens were much more potent in mediating these nongenomic responses (activation of MAPKs, PRL release, and increased intracellular [Ca²⁺]) via mERα than was previously reported for genomic responses. The unique non-monotonic dose responses and variant signaling patterns caused by E₂ and all tested phytoestrogens suggest that complex and multiple signaling pathways or binding partners could be involved. By activating these different nongenomic signaling pathways, phytoestrogens could have significant physiological consequences for pituitary cell functions.